The looming debt crisis in the United States has reached critical proportions, with the fiscal deficit ballooning to unprecedented levelsThe Treasury Department has forecasted that the deficit for the fiscal year 2024 will soar to an astounding $1.833 trillion, marking an 8% increase from the previous fiscal year of 2023.

In an ambitious move, Scott Bessenette, the nominee for Treasury Secretary and a considered financial expert, has laid out a plan to shrink the federal budget deficit to 3% of GDP by 2028. However, the feasibility of such an ambitious goal has been met with skepticism from various quarters.

Experts point to the challenges ahead, asserting that without raising taxes or reforming the social security system, achieving this goal will be incredibly arduousFurthermore, Bessenette faces formidable obstacles, including partisan divisions on fiscal policy, soaring debt interest expenditures, and a general decline in investor confidence regarding U.S

treasury securitiesThe Congressional Budget Office estimates that the federal budget deficit will hover around 6% of GDP for the next decade—far exceeding Bessenette’s target.

Whether or not Bessenette can effectively implement his fiscal vision remains to be seen.

"The deficit is simply too large to manage," he acknowledged during a Manhattan Institute event in June"These fiscal deficits shock me." His concerns stem from the belief that unchecked budget deficits could pose a "national security issue," hampering the country’s ability to borrow in times of major crises, such as wars or natural disasters.

In the fiscal landscape, the troubling factors cannot be ignored: the U.Shas accrued a level of debt that far surpasses previous estimations and exemplifies a persistent trend since the financial crisis of 2008. This trajectory was exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to unsustainable fiscal expenditures.

To further complicate matters, the cost of servicing this debt has dramatically escalated

• China's Chip Industry Sees Progress
• Bitcoin Under Scrutiny: Scam or Bubble?
• Empowering Investors for Long-Term Success
• The Logic Behind Global Commodity Pricing
• Breakfast Insights FM Radio | December 18, 2024

From a figure of just under $17 trillion at the end of 2019, it has now burgeoned to approximately $28 trillion, a ratio to GDP that exceeds levels seen during the Second World War.

In 2024 alone, the federal government’s net interest payments are projected to be around $882 billion—marking the first instance where this figure has eclipsed the defense budgetAs such, the burden of debt servicing is becoming a predominant aspect of federal expenditures and is only expected to increase in the coming years.

Acknowledging this crisis, Bessenette has proposed critical fiscal reforms designed to mitigate the severity of the deficitHe has laid out measures including limiting government spending, deregulating industries, boosting domestic energy production, and lowering taxesThese are viewed as essential levers to stimulate economic growth and ultimately reduce the deficit.

Nonetheless, the harsh reality that Bessenette faces is that the sheer scale of the deficit and the associated debt burden transcend historical norms

Solutions to these challenges cannot solely rely on accelerating economic growth; rather, comprehensive reforms in taxation and social welfare expenditures are imperative.

Professor Jason Furman of Harvard University emphasizes this point: "Without increasing taxes or reforming social security, Medicare, and Medicaid, the goals of a 3% GDP deficit are virtually unattainable."

The backdrop of prolonged debates over tax increases has left Congress in a quagmireThe focus for the upcoming year appears to shift towards extending existing tax cuts set to expire soon, curtailing serious discussions on fiscal policy adjustments.

For Bessenette’s goal of reducing the deficit to 3% to materialize, the key determinant lies in controlling the costs associated with debt servicingSince the end of 2019, the debt burden has surged, amplifying with rising interest rates, thereby inflating repayment costs artificially.

According to Subadra Rajappa, head of U.S

interest rate strategy at Société Générale, this mounting fiscal challenge is, indeed, the most pressing issueShe notes that "a significant portion of the deficit stems from interest payments," insisting that "there's little the Treasury can practically do."

Moreover, Bessenette must navigate a significant challenge termed "rollover risk," which is the declining appetite for U.Streasury securities among investorsShould market confidence in U.Sdebt waver, it could create formidable obstacles for the government, potentially leading to severe difficulties in servicing debts on time.

Jean Boivin from BlackRock noted recently that yields on government securities could surge again, edging closer to the 5% markSuch an eventuality would drastically alter the "budget calculations" to a more disadvantageous outlookThe Pacific Investment Management Company has expressed hesitation in buying long-term U.S

treasuries due to the escalating debt crisis.

So, is Bessenette’s goal of a 3% deficit achievable? Some economists, buoyed by the prospect of Bessenette's capabilities, suggest that he can catalyze fiscal reforms through sound limits on government spending and incentivizing economic growth while aiming to alleviate inflationary pressures.

Currently, a significant portion—22%—of the national debt comprises short-term treasury billsAnalysts posit that should the Federal Reserve lower interest rates over the next few years, the government could witness a reduction in the interest payments on this short-term debt, potentially alleviating some fiscal tensions.

Economists are keenly awaiting the Fed's forthcoming interest rate forecastsObservations suggest that should rates decline from the current 4.6% to around 2%, the yearly interest payments on treasury bills could diminish by 1.1% of GDP.

Yet, despite these glimmers of hope, there remains skepticism about the government's ability to achieve this ambitious 3% deficit target